Mehmet submitted a short story about humans colonizing Mars in the year 2077. He received two pieces of peer feedback:
Peer A: "Your descriptions of the Martian landscape are amazing! But the first paragraph feels a bit too long and slows down the start of the story."
Peer B: "I loved the detailed introduction; it really set the scene for life on Mars. Maybe you could add more dialogue between the characters in the middle section."
Mehmet, bu çelişkili geri bildirimleri aldıktan sonra, yazısını gözden geçirme sürecinde EN İYİ nasıl ilerlemelidir?
A) Immediately cut down the first paragraph, as one peer suggested it was too long.
B) Only focus on adding more dialogue, as that was a specific suggestion for improvement.
C) Completely disregard both pieces of feedback since they contradict each other.
D) Critically evaluate both suggestions, reread his introduction to assess its pacing and purpose, and consider if additional dialogue serves the story.
E) Ask a third peer to choose which feedback is better for him.